Our bestseller. Discover our variety of flavors in the trial set.
In the world of nutrition, bogeymen change over the decades. In the 90s, it was fat that was considered the main cause of all problems, whereas today, the focus is on sugar. We often tend to think in extremes: everything containing sugar is cut out, and one seeks refuge in artificial sweeteners. However, science paints a more complex picture. While some studies warn of potential risks, such as a carcinogenic effect of certain sweeteners, reality shows that, ultimately, almost anything can be "potentially harmful" if consumed without moderation. Anyone who tries to give up everything often loses not only the joy of eating but also the perspective on a truly balanced diet.
Physics instead of sin: The mouthfeel
In sensory science, sugar is not an "evil additive" but an indispensable tool for filling the void left by alcohol. Alcohol provides viscosity—that is, weight and density on the palate. When it is removed, the liquid often feels watery. Sugar restores this lost texture to the drink. It acts as a carrier wave that makes fine nuances of herbs or fruits tangible in the first place, instead of having them pass by the palate without effect.
Indulgence vs. staple food: The dose makes the poison
The context is often forgotten in the sugar debate. A classic soft drink consumed by the liter as a thirst quencher is subject to different standards than an aperitif. An aperitif—just like a high-quality dessert—is a conscious moment of indulgence. A balanced approach to nutrition allows for these moments of joy. Anyone who denies themselves such pleasure entirely ignores the fact that satisfaction and culinary arts are also part of a healthy lifestyle. It is not about daily calorie requirements, but about craftsmanship in the glass.
The choice of means: Why household sugar is underestimated
In production, there are enormous differences in the choice of sweetener. Often, "modern" alternatives sound better on paper, but are problematic in practice:
- Beet sugar (sucrose): Often dismissed as simple household sugar, it is actually a high-quality, local product. Obtained from regional beets, it offers a short supply chain and is taste-neutral.
- The fructose dilemma: Many people reach for fruit sweetener or agave syrup because it sounds "more natural." However, especially in cases of intolerances like fructose malabsorption, household sugar (which consists of equal parts glucose and fructose) is often much easier to digest than pure fruit sweeteners.
- Alternative sugar types: Coconut blossom sugar brings strong characteristic aromas (caramel) and a dark color, which masks the fine characteristics of many botanicals.
- Sweeteners (stevia, erythritol, etc.): They save calories but often have a metallic aftertaste that "breaks off" on the palate. Furthermore, the body of research regarding long-term effects and tolerability is much more controversial for many artificial substitutes than it is for classic sugar.
The mastery of balance
The true art lies in not using sugar as a solo entertainer. A high-quality aperitif uses it only as a foundation for its counterparts: bitterness, acidity, and astringency. Only when these components interlock does a drink emerge that tastes not "cloyingly sweet," but mature and profound.
A question of the joy of indulgence
In the non-alcoholic world, sugar is no savior, but it is a necessary anchor. Those who shift the focus from deprivation to balance realize that the responsible use of sugar ensures more enjoyment and less stress on the palate. The quality of a drink is not measured by the sheer absence of calories, but by the craftsmanship and the quality of the raw materials—such as the honest, domestic sugar beet.
